New consent requirements for genetic analyses
Official title (in Danish): Bekendtgørelse om information og samtykke i forbindelse med behandling og ved videregivelse og indhentning af helbredsoplysninger m.v
In short
Reading time: 1 min- What changes:
- Consent to certain genetic analyses must now be in writing and must address secondary findings.
- The consent must be explicit, but implied consent may be enough in some cases if it is clear that the patient agrees.
- Explicit consent can be given both orally and in writing, but not for the genetic analyses where it must be in writing.
- When: The executive order entered into force on 1 July 2019.
Written by AI from verbatim quotes from the source and checked by code and AI. Dates, tables and the fact box are calculated by fixed rules. Unofficial translation. Always read the original.
Consent must be explicit – this already applied before, as the executive order already required explicit consent. However, implied consent can still be enough if the patient clearly agrees to the treatment. Explicit consent can be given both orally and in writing, with certain exceptions. Explicit consent can still be given both orally and in writing, but not for certain genetic analyses, where consent must be in writing.
Consent to certain genetic analyses must always be in writing. The consent must also address secondary findings. The analyses covered include whole genome sequencing, exome sequencing, total RNA sequencing and several others, which are listed in annex 1.
A patient aged 15 or over must be informed before consent to genetic analysis is given. The patient must know that genetic information at the National Genome Center may be limited to the treatment of the patient and purposes directly related to it. The information is given in writing on a form from the National Genome Center.
The executive order no longer mentions "other purely private matters" in the rules on consent to disclosure and collection. The same applies to the rule on disclosure to third countries.
Sources and original
Read the official text (in Danish) →
Source: Retsinformation.dk
Translated from Danish · The Danish version and the original source apply.
Timeline
How to read the timeline
- Filled dot: this has happened. The date and the source are shown below the point.
- Empty dot: an upcoming step. The date may be known or not known yet.
- Square: the case ended here, e.g. because the bill was rejected or withdrawn.
- "The date is in the source, but entry into force has not been confirmed yet" (or just "not confirmed yet") means the date has passed, but the source does not yet show that the law or rule has entered into force. We only change the status when the source confirms it.
- Issued · 4 April 2019
- Published in the Danish Law Gazette (Lovtidende) · 6 April 2019
- In force · 1 July 2019