Proposal: seized dogs should as a rule be able to stay with their owner under supervision
Official title (in Danish): Forslag til folketingsbeslutning om at lade hunde i verserende sager blive hos deres ejere under elektronisk overvågning
All proposals for parliamentary resolutions by Danmarksdemokraterne
In short
Reading time: 1 min- Proposed by: Danmarksdemokraterne (6 members, first named: Kim Edberg Andersen)
- What is proposed: The proposal calls on the Danish Parliament to ask the government to introduce a bill so that seized dogs in a pending case under the Dog Act can, as a rule, stay with their owner.
- Who would be affected: The proposal concerns dogs seized in a pending case under the Dog Act, and their owners.
- When: The proposal has not been adopted yet. A proposal for a parliamentary resolution is not an act and does not change the rules by itself. If the Danish Parliament adopts it, it is usually a call on the government to act.
Written by AI from verbatim quotes from the source and checked by code and AI. Dates, tables and the fact box are calculated by fixed rules. Unofficial translation. Always read the original.
What the proposal says:
- The government must introduce the necessary bills on seized dogs in a pending case under the Dog Act.
- The dog can, as a rule, stay with its owner while the case is being handled.
- This requires that it can happen without risk to the surroundings.
- Effective conditions for the dog's stay must be able to be set, including requirements for electronic monitoring and restrictions on the dog's movements.
Sources and original
Read the official text (in Danish) →
The case at the Danish Parliament (ft.dk)
Source: the Official Report of the Danish Parliament (Folketingstidende) and ft.dk
Translated from Danish · The Danish version and the original source apply.
Summary by the Danish Parliament (in Danish)
Forslaget pålægger regeringen at fremsætte de nødvendige lovforslag, så hunde, der er beslaglagt i verserende sager efter hundeloven, som udgangspunkt kan blive hos deres ejer under sagens behandling f.eks. under elektronisk overvågning, hvis det kan ske uden risiko for omgivelserne.
Source: Folketinget (ft.dk). Reproduced unchanged.
Timeline
How to read the timeline
- Filled dot: this has happened. The date and the source are shown below the point.
- Empty dot: an upcoming step. The date may be known or not known yet.
- Square: the case ended here, e.g. because the bill was rejected or withdrawn.
- "The date is in the source, but entry into force has not been confirmed yet" (or just "not confirmed yet") means the date has passed, but the source does not yet show that the law or rule has entered into force. We only change the status when the source confirms it.
- Introduced · 9 October 2026Status in the Danish Parliament: Fremsat
- 1st readingThe date is not known yet
- Adopted or rejectedAwaiting the Danish Parliament