Skip to content
AboutDansk
ProposedChildren and schools

Proposal: teaching materials about the Muhammad crisis in the Danish folkeskole

Official title (in Danish): Forslag til folket­ings­beslut­ning om at opdatere skolesik­ker­heds­bered­skab­splanerne og udarbejde un­der­vis­nings­forløb om Muhammedkrisen til brug i undervisningen i folkeskolen

Parliamentary resolution · B 42 (2026-27) · Un­der­vis­nings­min­is­ter­iet

All proposals for parliamentary resolutions by Dan­marks­de­mokraterne, Dansk Folkeparti, Det Konservative Folkeparti, Liberal Alliance

In short

Reading time: 1 min
  • Proposed by: Liberal Alliance (Helena Artmann Andresen); Dansk Folkeparti (Josephine Alstrup Kofod); Det Konservative Folkeparti (Lise Bertelsen); Dan­marks­de­mokraterne (Marlene Harpsøe)
  • What is proposed:
    • The proposal calls on the Danish Parliament to require the government to update the school safety preparedness plans and to develop teaching materials about the Muhammad crisis.
    • The Danish Parliament also requires the government to include the Muhammad crisis as a formative period in the national history canon.
  • Who would be affected: The proposal concerns teachers in the Danish folkeskole, who can use the teaching materials in their lessons.
  • When: The proposal has not been adopted yet. A proposal for a parliamentary resolution is not an act and does not change the rules by itself. If the Danish Parliament adopts it, it is usually a call on the government to act.

Written by AI from verbatim quotes from the source and checked by code and AI. Dates, tables and the fact box are calculated by fixed rules. Unofficial translation. Always read the original.

What the proposal says:

  • The government must ensure that the school safety preparedness plans are updated.
  • The government must develop teaching materials on emu.dk about the Muhammad crisis that teachers in the folkeskole can use in their lessons.
  • The government must include the Muhammad crisis as a formative period in the national history canon.

Sources and original

Read the official text (in Danish) →

The case at the Danish Parliament (ft.dk)

Source: the Official Report of the Danish Parliament (Folketingstidende) and ft.dk

Translated from Danish · The Danish version and the original source apply.

Timeline

How to read the timeline

  • Filled dot: this has happened. The date and the source are shown below the point.
  • Empty dot: an upcoming step. The date may be known or not known yet.
  • Square: the case ended here, e.g. because the bill was rejected or withdrawn.
  • "The date is in the source, but entry into force has not been confirmed yet" (or just "not confirmed yet") means the date has passed, but the source does not yet show that the law or rule has entered into force. We only change the status when the source confirms it.
  1. Introduced · 30 October 2026
    Status in the Danish Parliament: Fremsat
    Folketingets Åbne Data – sagstrin: fremsættelse
  2. 1st reading
    The date is not known yet
  3. Adopted or rejected
    Awaiting the Danish Parliament