Skip to content
AboutDansk
ProposedNature and animals

Proposal: The Danish Parliament must require the government to enable conservation of sika deer in deer parks

Parliamentary resolution · B 49 (2026-27) · Ministeriet for Natur og DyrevelfærdOfficial title (in Danish)

Official title (in Danish): Forslag til folket­ings­beslut­ning om at muliggøre bevaringen af de danske dyrehavers og zoologiske havers sikabestande

All proposals for parliamentary resolutions by Dansk Folkeparti, Venstre, Danmarks Liberale Parti

In short

Reading time: 1 min
  • Proposed by: Dansk Folkeparti (Christian Kirk); Venstre, Danmarks Liberale Parti (Marie Brixtofte)
  • What is proposed: The proposal suggests that the Danish Parliament requires the government, during the current parliamentary session, to enable the conservation of sika deer in deer parks and zoos.
  • Who would be affected: The proposal concerns sika deer in deer parks and zoos.
  • When: The proposal has not been adopted yet. A proposal for a parliamentary resolution is not an act and does not change the rules by itself. If the Danish Parliament adopts it, it is usually a call on the government to act.

Written by AI from verbatim quotes from the source and checked by code and AI. Dates, tables and the fact box are calculated by fixed rules. Unofficial translation. Always read the original.

What the proposal says:

  • The Danish Parliament must require the government, during the current parliamentary session, to enable the conservation of sika deer.
  • The conservation applies to sika deer in deer parks and zoos.

Sources and original

Official title (in Danish)Forslag til folket­ings­beslut­ning om at muliggøre bevaringen af de danske dyrehavers og zoologiske havers sikabestande

Read the official text (in Danish) →

The case at the Danish Parliament (ft.dk)

Source: the Official Report of the Danish Parliament (Folketingstidende) and ft.dk

Translated from Danish · The Danish version and the original source apply.

Timeline

How to read the timeline

  • Filled dot: this has happened. The date and the source are shown below the point.
  • Empty dot: an upcoming step. The date may be known or not known yet.
  • Square: the case ended here, e.g. because the bill was rejected or withdrawn.
  • "The date is in the source, but entry into force has not been confirmed yet" (or just "not confirmed yet") means the date has passed, but the source does not yet show that the law or rule has entered into force. We only change the status when the source confirms it.
  1. Introduced · 10 November 2026
    Status in the Danish Parliament: Fremsat
    Folketingets Åbne Data – sagstrin: fremsættelse
  2. 1st reading
    The date is not known yet
  3. Adopted or rejected
    Awaiting the Danish Parliament